تحلیل ویژگی‌های فرم و تزیین در زیرپاهای حنابندان دوره‌های قاجار و پهلوی در ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

استادیار گروه هنر، دانشکده هنر و معماری، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز،ایران

چکیده

آیین حنابندان از رسوم کهن فرهنگ عامۀ ایران است که با مفاهیم زیبایی‌شناسی، آیینی و اجتماعی درهم‌تنیده است. یکی از ابزارهای کمتر شناخته‌شدۀ این آیین، «زیرپای حنابندان» است که کارکردی هم‌زمان کاربردی و نمادین دارد. پژوهش حاضر با هدف شناسایی، طبقه‌بندی و تحلیل ویژگی‌های فرمی و تزیینی این اشیا در دورۀ قاجار و پهلوی، به روش توصیفی‌تحلیلی و با رویکرد توسعه‌ای انجام شده است. داده‌ها ازطریق مطالعات میدانی در موزه‌های مردم‌شناسی و مجموعه‌‌های خصوصی ده استان کشور و نیز منابع مکتوب تاریخی گردآوری شده‌اند. یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهد زیرپای حنابندان ازنظر جنس به سه دستۀ سنگی، چوبی و فلزی تقسیم می‌شوند که هریک دارای کیفیت‌های بصری و سطح مهارت‌ فنی متفاوتی هستند. نمونه‌های سنگی ساده و کاربردی، نمونه‌های فلزی با تنوع نقوش اما مهارت متوسط و نمونه‌های چوبی ظریف و منبت‌کاری شده‌اند. تحلیل نتایج نشان می‌دهد تفاوت در فرم و نقش این آثار نه‌تنها به ویژگی‌های فنی مواد اولیه بلکه به متغیرهای فرهنگی، اقتصادی و اجتماعی جوامع تولیدکننده مرتبط است. این اشیا به‌مثابۀ بازتابی از ذوق عامه، باورهای آیینی و بازنمایی هویت زنانه در آیین ازدواج، بخشی از میراث مادی و معنوی ایران را تشکیل می‌دهند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

An Analysis of Formal and Decorative Features of Henna-Ceremony Footstool in the Qajar and Pahlavi Eras in Iran

نویسنده [English]

  • Mehdi Arjmand Inaloo
Assistant Professor, Department of Arts, Faculty of Arts and Architecture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction
The use of henna has been widespread among Iranians. This ritual has had diverse functions, including cosmetic, medicinal, and religious ones. The use of henna is manifested through its own specific rituals and objects. It appears that across the vast geography and ethnic diversity of Iran, these objects and rituals exhibit differences. Varied ritual characteristics have undergone changes and evolution in the way henna ceremonies were performed. Corresponding to these changes, the tools and equipment used have also transformed. In most regions of Iran, these objects are fabrics with unique decorations, especially prepared for each celebration. Another item used in these ceremonies is the henna-ceremony footstool.The henna ceremony footstool is an ornate bench used in henna ceremonies, placed under the feet. As one sits on a chair or stool,he/she places the soles of both feet on the concave arches designed as a footstool.
Materials and Methods
Henna ceremony footstools show little variation in the overall form and function. Their primary differences lie in the materials used and decorative patterns. In all texts reviewed by the author, only stone footstools were mentioned, implying a lack of awareness of the other types made from different materials. Given that stone, wood, and metal footstools existed in the Qajar period and the sources and knowledge about these objectswere limited, research in this area is essential. Both the Qajar and, to some extent, the contemporary specimens of these objects are available for study in terms of the number and the quality of decorative patterns. Furthermore, these objects are deeply connected to the realm of popular culture.The present research, aiming to identify, classify, and analyze the formal and decorative features of these objects in the Qajar and Pahlavi periods, deployed a descriptive-analytic method with a developmental approach.
Numerous specimens of henna ceremony footstools were found in anthropological museums and private collections. Since the customs related to henna ceremonies in Iran were fading, the use of these objects has also become limited. Collecting the images of these footstools required extensive field research across the vast geography of Iran. Accordingly, the statistical population of this research included all henna ceremony footstools produced in Iran. The statistical sample, selected purposively based on accessibility, included all artifacts (or their documented images and sources) belonging to the Qajar and the early Pahlavi eras, which were extracted from anthropological museums and private collectors in ten locations across Iran (provinces of Fars, Yazd, Kerman, Isfahan, Lorestan, Arak, Tehran, and Mazandaran).
Within the framework of its documented findings regarding the triple interaction of raw material type, socio-economic variables, and popular culture in the formation of henna ceremony footstools, this research investigated the following central question: how could the key factors affecting the artistic quality and decorative features of henna ceremony footstools (stone, metal, wood) be explained within the framework of the interaction of these three materials?
 Results and Findings
Based on the research findings, from a quantitative perspective, the highest frequency in the studied dataset belonged to stone samples. This finding, consistent with the evidence documented in historical texts and contemporary research, indicated the prominent position of stone as the primary material in the production of these artifacts. Metal samples, primarily made of copper, ranked second in frequency. Although the use of these samples in humid environments like bathhouses presented limitations, the significant number of surviving metal artifacts from the Qajar era indicated their continued use during specific time frames. In contrast, wooden samples had the smallest share in the studied collection.
The patterns used on henna ceremony footstools were executed at three different levels, depending on the material:

Stone Henna Footstool:Limited, geometric decorations.
Copper Henna Footstool:Numerous decorations, medium production
Wooden Henna Board:Numerous decorations, high-quality production. These artifacts were primarily made from local marble at low cost. The simple, unsigned construction method, along with inattention to non-visible surfaces, suggested mass production and pure functionality. Evidence, including oral histories, raised the possibility of their production by non-specialists (such as housewives). The consistent design of these stones over time indicated the priority of popular ritual function over artistic aspects, presenting them as the evidence of ritual practices and perhaps a reflection of social hierarchy. In contrast, copper footstools from regions with copper mines exhibited greater decorative diversity, adorned with busy and local engravings (likely influenced by popular taste in regions like Kerman or Yazd). These artifacts were more expensive and probably targeted a middle-class clientele. The most distinctive samples were the wooden henna boards with delicate marquetry, influenced by the Abadeh marquetry traditions and Gol-o-Morgh (flower and bird) paintings. Their delicacy and use of high-quality wood indicated production for an affluent consumer market in the late Qajar period. Although historical samples were rare, the limited production of these boards in the north of Fars province continued as part of dowries, demonstrating their functional flexibility and symbolic traditional identity in contemporary ceremonies. Overall, these objects carry the socio-cultural weight of their period and had largely lost their primary function in contemporary era.

Conclusion
The results of this research have shown that henna ceremony footstools are not mere ritual tools, but they are the cultural documents of the interaction between popular arts, social classes, and the geographical environment in Iran. These objects were identified based on raw materials into three groups: stone, wood, and metal, each of which reflected the economic conditions, aesthetic taste, and the technical skills of their makers. While stone samples signified simplicity and functionality among the general public, wooden and metal samples reflected artistic skills as well as a tendency toward more refined decorations. From a semiotic perspective, the floral, animal, and human motifs used in these works conveyed meanings such as fertility, purity, auspiciousness, and the protection of the bride against the evil eye—concepts rooted in feminine beliefs and rites of passage to marriage. The continued production of wooden samples in Abadeh also indicated the dynamism of material culture and the continuity of indigenous traditions within contemporary society. Accordingly, henna ceremony footstools can be considered a ‘cultural medium’ in which popular arts, social rituals, and ritual symbolism are interwoven. Continued ethnographic and laboratory studies regarding the origin of raw materials and the symbolic meanings of their motifs can lead to a deeper understanding of the place of women's ritual arts in Iranian culture.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • popular culture
  • henna
  • traditional arts
  • handicrafts
  • henna ceremony footstool
اسپنانی، محمدعلی. (۱۴۰۳). بررسی نقش سرمه‌دان در نقش‌پردازی دست‌بافت‌های کاربردی. ماهنامۀ پژوهش در هنر و علوم انسانی، ۹ (۱)،  پیاپی ۶۴، ۱-۸.
پوپ، ابراهام. (۱۳۸۷). سیری در هنر ایران: از دوران پیشاتاریخ تا امروز. ترجمۀ نجف دریابندری. تهران: انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی.
تاورنیه، جان باتیست. (۱۳۳۶). سفرنامۀ تاورنیه. ترجمۀ ابوتراب نوری. اصفهان: نشر کتابخانۀ سنایی.
خوانساری، محمد بن حسین آقاجمال. (۱۳۴۹). عقاید النساء مشهور به کلثوم ننه، در عقاید النساء و مرآت البلهاء: دو رساله انتقادی در فرهنگ توده. چاپ محمود کتیرائی. تهران: طهوری.
دآلمانی، هانری رنه. (۱۳۷۸). از خراسان تا بختیاری. ترجمۀ غلامرضا سمیعی. چ۱. تهران:طاووس.
دلاواله، پیترو. (۱۳۷۰). سفرنامۀ پیترو دلاواله: قسمت مربوط به ایران. ترجمۀ شعاع‌الدین شفا. تهران:انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی.
دهخدا، علی‌اکبر. ۱۳۷۳. لغت‌نامه. ۱۵ ج. تهران- ایران: روزنه.
رفیع‌فر، جلال‌الدین، و کماللو، خدیجه. (۱۳۹۳). بررسی آیین حنابندان از دیرباز تاکنون (مطالعۀ اسنادی ۱۰ منطقه در ایران). فرهنگ و ادبیات عامه، ۲ (۴)،  ۲۷-۵۳.
زرگری، علی. (۱۳۶۷). گیاهان دارویی. تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
سرنا، کارلا. (۱۳۶۲). سفرنامۀ مادام کارلا سرنا: آدمها و آیین‌ها در ایران. ترجمۀ علی‌اصغر سعیدی. تهران: زوار.
سهیلی اصفهانی، بهروز، و صابر، زینب. (۱۴۰۱). گسست صنایع‌دستی ایران از هنرهای زیبا در نسبت با گفتمان سلطنتی قاجار با تأکید بر دوگانۀ هنرهای زیبا-هنرهای کاربردی. هنرهای صناعی ایران، ۵ (۲)، پیاپی ۹، ۱۲۹-۱۴۰.
شاردن، ژان. (۱۳۷۵). سیاحت‌نامۀ شاردن. ترجمۀ اقبال یغمایی. تهران: انتشارات توس.
شکورزاده، ابراهیم. (۱۳۶۳). عقاید و رسوم مردم خراسان. تهران:بی‌نا.
شیمل، آنه ماری. (۱۳۸۰). راز اعداد: نمادگرایی اعداد در فرهنگ اسلامی. ترجمۀ فاطمه توفیقی. قم: انتشارات دانشگاه ادیان و مذاهب.
فروزانفر، بدیع‌الزمان. (۱۳۵۵). تصحیح کلیات شمس جلال‌الدین محمد بن محمد مولوی یا دیوان کبیر. تهران: نشر راد.
فقیری، ابوالقاسم. (۱۳۹۳). عروسی در فارس. شیراز: انتشارات نوید.
کنبای، شیلا. (۱۳۸۹). نماد و اسطوره در نگارگری ایرانی. ترجمۀ فرهاد قابوسی. تهران: امیرکبیر.
مسعود سعد سلمان. (۱۳۸۴). دیوان مسعود سلمان. به کوشش پرویز بابایی. تهران: نگاه.
منوچهری دامغانی. (۱۳۴۷). دیوان منوچهری. به کوشش دکتر محمد دبیرسیاقی. چ۳. تهران: انتشارات کتاب‌فروشی زوار.
مهستی گنجوی، طاهری شهاب، محمد، و فرامرزی، عبدالرحمن. (۱۳۴۷). دیوان مهستی گنجوی. تهران: ابن سینا.
نفیسی، سعید. (۱۳۳۶). محیط زندگی و احوال و اشعار رودکی. تهران: انتشارات امیرکبیر.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Translated by R. Nice.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
d'Allemagne, H. R. (1911). Du Khorassan au pays des Backhtiaris: trois mois de voyage en Perse. Hachette.
http://www.iranica.com/newsite/index.isc?Article=http://www.iranica.com/newsite/articl es/v12f2/v12f2034.html, retrieved August 2, 2009
Jones, C. Catherine (2009). The Patterns of Persian Henna.
Khansari , M. (1881). Kitabi Kulsum naneh, ou, le Livre des dames de la Perse, traduit et annote par J. Thonnelier, Paris: Ernest Leroux Editeur.
Massé, H. (1938.) Croyances et coutumes persanes. (Vols. 1–2). G. P. Maisonneuve.
Nasr, H. (1990). Art and Spirituality. New Delhi: Delhi.
References
Alam, H. (2008). Encyclopedia Iranica article on Henna.
Aspenani, M. A. (2024). A study of the role of the "Sorma-dan" (Kohl Container) in the Design of Functional Textiles. Monthly Journal of Research in Art and Humanities, 9(1), Serial No. 64, 1-8. [in Persian]
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Translated by R. Nice.
Canby, S. R. (2010). Symbol and myth in Persianpainting. Translated by Farhad Ghobadi. Tehran: Amir Kabir. [in Persian]
Chardin, J. (1996). Chardin's travelogue. Translated by Eghbal Yaghmaei. Tehran: Toos Publications. [in Persian]
d'Allemagne, H. R. (1911). Du Khorassan au pays des Backhtiaris: Trois mois de voyage en Perse. Hachette.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
d'Allemagne, H. R. (1999). From Khorasan to Bakhtiari. Translated by Gholamreza Samiei. 1st Edition. Tehran: Tavoos. [in Persian]
Della Valle, P. (11991). The travelogue of Pietro Della Valle: The Part Related to Iran. Translated by Shoa'eddin Shafa. Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publications. [in Persian]
Faghiri, A. (2014). Wedding customs in Fars. Shiraz: Navid Publications. [in Persian]
Foruzanfar, B. (1976). Correction of "Kolliyat-e Shams" by Jalal al-Din Mohammad bin Mohammad Mowlavi, or "Divan-e Kabir". Tehran: Rad Publications. [in Persian]
Jones, C. Catherine (2009).The patterns of Persian henna.
Katiraei, Mahmoud. (1999). From khash to khash. Tehran: Sales Publications. [in Persian]
Khansari, M. (1881).Kitabi Kulsum naneh, ou, le Livre des dames de la Perse, traduit et annote par J. Thonnelier, Paris: Ernest Leroux Editeur.
Khansari, M. (1970). Aqayed al-nesa' (Popularly known as Kolthoum Naneh), in Aqayed al-nesa' and mer'at al-bolaha: Two Critical Treatises on Popular Culture. Edited by Mahmoud Katiraei. Tehran: Tahouri. [in Persian]
Ganjavi,M., Taheri, Sh. M., & Faramarzi, A. (1968). Divan-e Mahsati Ganjavi. Tehran: Ibn Sina. [in Persian]
Manuchehri Damghani. (1968). Divan-e Manuchehri. Edited by Dr. Mohammad Dabirsiaghi. 3rd Edition. Tehran: Zavvar Publications. [in Persian]
Massé, H. (1954.) Croyances et coutumes persanes. Translated by Charles A. Messner as Persian Beliefs and Customs, New Haven.
Mas'ud S. S. (2005). Divan-e Mas'ud Sa'd Salman. Edited by Parviz Babaei. Tehran: Negah. [in Persian]
Nafisi, Sa'id. (1957). Rudaki's living environment, life, and poems. Tehran: Amir Kabir Publications. [in Persian]
Nasr, H. (1990). Art and spirituality. New Delhi: Delhi
Pope, A. U. (2008). A survey of Persian art: From prehistoric times to the present. Translated by Najaf Daryabandari. Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publications. [in Persian]
Rafifar, J., & Kamalloo, K. (2014). A study of the ‘henna-bandan’ritual from the past to the present (A documentedstudy of 10 regions in Iran). Culture and Popular Literature, 2(4), 27-53. [in Persian]
Schimmel, A. (2001). The mystery of numbers: Numerical symbolism in Islamic culture. Translated by Fatemeh Tofighi. Qom: University of Religions and Denominations Press. [in Persian]
Serena, C. (1983). Madame Carla Serena's travelogue: People and customs in Iran. Translated by Ali-Asghar Sa'idi. Tehran: No Publisher. [in Persian]
Shahidi, J. et al. (1994). Logat-nameh (Dehkhoda Dictionary). 15 Vols. Tehran, Iran: Rozaneh. [in Persian]
Shakurzadeh, E. (1984). Beliefs and customs of the people of Khorasan. Tehran: No Publisher. [in Persian]
Soheili Isfahani, B., & Saber, Z. (2022). The disconnection of Iranian handicrafts from fine arts in relation to the Qajar royal discourse, emphasizing the fine arts-applied arts dichotomy. Iranian Crafts, 5(2), 129-140. [in Persian]
Tavernier, J.B. (1957). Tavernier's travelogue. Translated by Abutorab Nouri. Isfahan: Sanaei Library Press. [in Persian]
Zargari, A. (1988). Medicinal plants. Tehran: University of Tehran Press. [in Persian]