فن‌شناسی و آسیب‌شناسی قالی زربافت سالتینگ موزۀ فرش ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانش‌آموخته کارشناسی‌ارشد گروه مرمت اشیاء فرهنگی و تاریخی، گروه مرمت آثار و اشیاء فرهنگی، دانشگاه هنر اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران

2 دانشیار گروه مرمت آثار و اشیاء فرهنگی، دانشگاه هنر اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران، نویسندۀ مسئول

3 مدرس مدعو گروه فرش، دانشگاه هنر اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران

چکیده

دورۀ صفویه به‌واسطۀ قالی‌های برجای‌مانده، یکی از مهم‌ترین ادوار در تاریخ قالی‌بافی ایران به شمار می‌رود. در میان آثار شاخص این دوره، قالی‌های موسوم به «سالتینگ» جایگاهی ویژه دارند؛ آثاری که با وجود نام غیرایرانی، ازنظر ساختار و ویژگی‌های فنی، از برجسته‌ترین نمونه‌های هنر قالیبافی صفوی محسوب می‌شوند. پژوهش حاضر به مطالعۀ تطبیقی، تحلیل فنون ساخت و آسیب‌شناسی یکی از قالی‌های زربافت سالتینگ دورۀ صفویۀ موجود در موزۀ فرش ایران پرداخته است. مطالعات فن‌شناسی با هدف شناسایی ساختار، مواد و فنون به‌کاررفته در بافت اثر انجام شد. این قالی ترکیبی از الیاف پشم، ابریشم و نخ‌های فلزی گلابتون (نقره با روکش طلا) است. در بررسی‌های میکروسکوپی، شیمی‌تر، لوپ دیجیتال و روش‌های دستگاهی FTIR  و  SEM-EDS مشخص شد که تکنیک بافت از نوع لول و تکنیک گلابتون‌بافی از نوع سوف‌باف است. آزمون‌های رنگ‌سنجی نشان داد که در رنگرزی الیاف آبی از نیل و در الیاف قرمز لاکی از ترکیب رناس و قرمزدانه استفاده شده است. ازنظر ویژگی‌های هنری و فنی، قالی دارای طرح و نقوش منطبق بر سنت قالی‌بافی صفوی بوده و وجود کتیبه‌هایی با اشعار فارسی، از مهم‌ترین شاخصه‌های آن است. ساختار ترکیبی ابریشم و پشم در کنار استفاده از نخ‌های فلزی گلابتون، از ویژگی‌های برجستۀ این گروه از قالی‌ها به شمار می‌رود. بررسی‌های آسیب‌شناسی نشان داد که اثر دچار آلودگی‌های سطحی، رنگ‌پریدگی، دورنگی، پوسیدگی، پارگی، شکنندگی الیاف ابریشمی و فلزی و کمبود بخش‌هایی از بافت است. همچنین، الیاف فلزی گلابتون کدر و تیره شده و آنالیز SEM-EDS خوردگی‌های سولفیدی و کلریدی را نشان داد که احتمالاً ناشی از شست‌وشوی گذشته و شرایط نامناسب نگهداری بوده است. این یافته‌ها شناخت دقیقی از وضعیت فعلی اثر و ویژگی‌های فنی آن فراهم می‌سازد و جایگاه آن را در میان قالی‌های صفوی روشن‌تر می‌کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Technology and Pathology of Salting Woven Carpets, Iranian Carpet Museum

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mina Karimi 1
  • Hamidreza Bakhshandehfard 2
  • Mehdi Ebrahimi 3
1 M.A. Graduate in Conservation of Cultural and Historical Objects, Department of Conservation of Cultural Properties, Faculty of Conservation and Restoration, Art University of Isfahan, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Conservation of Cultural Properties, Faculty of Conservation and Restoration, Art University of Isfahan, Iran. (Corresponding Author)
3 Visiting Lecturer, Carpet Department, Art University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction
The Safavid period (1501–1722 CE) marks the golden age of Persian carpet weaving, enabled by political stability, economic prosperity, and royal patronage. Workshops in cities such as Isfahan, Kashan, Tabriz, and Kerman produced masterpieces now preserved in major museums (Pope & Ackerman, 2008). ‘Salting’ carpets— named after an English collector, George Salting,and crafted in 16th–17th century Safavid royal workshops— feature vibrant colors, dense knots, silk and wool foundations, silver-gilt threads, and designs, including medallions, mihrab, arabesques, and inscriptions. Iranian specimmesn are notable for their finesse and quality. Over time, environmental exposure, poor handling, and improper cleaning have caused fading, silk degradation, metal corrosion, and localized damage. Technical studies including fiber and dye analyses reveal their materials, weaving techniques, and historical context while they provide crucial insight for effective conservation and preservation strategies.
Research Method
The study focused on a late Safavid gilt-metal (Golabatun) medallion carpet, attributed to Tabriz, measuring 302×166 cm, with a corner-medallion (Lachak-Toranj) design, quarter field, and Nastaliq inscription. The carpet combines wool, silk, and silver-gilt threads, woven with symmetrical knots, and features main colors of red, navy, pistachio green, and orange. Despite previous restoration, the carpet exhibits damages including tears, stains, wear, and burn marks. Acomparative analysis with Safavid-period carpets was conducted to confirm dating, origin, and artistic features.Fiber sampling was minimaland including representative pile colors, warp, and weft, taken from deteriorated or loose areas to avoid damaging intact regions. Samples were coded and stored in sterile containers. Fiber identification combined microscopy, chemical tests, and burning analysis. Microscopic examination of longitudinal and cross-sections identified wool, silk, and cotton fibers, supported by chemical tests (NaOH for proteins; lead acetate for cellulosics) and combustion behavior. Sizing on the support was verified using Molisch and iodine-starch tests.Golabatun threads were analyzed using digital loop microscopy for surface wear, breakage, and corrosion, and SEM-EDS to determine chemical composition and structure. Nitric acid tests confirmed the presence of silver and trace copperalong with gold surface gilding verified by SEM and FTIR spectroscopy of the silk core.Weave structure was examined by counting knots, warp, and weft density; knot type and arrangement were also documented. Color identification involved preliminary chemical tests followed by FTIR spectroscopy to detect mordants and pigments.Conservation tests assessed fiber stability and sensitivity; aqueous swelling measured dimensional changes after wetting and drying; colorfastness tests evaluated resistance to light and humidity, and color transfer tests verified that washing would not leach dyes. These combined methods provided a comprehensive assessment of the carpet’s materials, structure, and conservation requirements while ensuring minimal damage during sampling.
 Research Findings
The Salting gilt-metal carpet from the Carpet Museum of Iran exhibited an asymmetrical (Persian) knot structure, a “Lool” weaving technique, silk warp and weft, fine wool pile, and gilt-metal (Golabatun) decorations with a silk core. Colorants were entirely natural and plant-based. Weaving density was measured at approximately nine knots per centimeter (about 60 knots per 6.5 cm), reflecting the weavers’ skill and precision. Microscopic examination confirmed the use of asymmetrical knots, with S-twist wefts and Z-twist Golabatun threads. The back curvature and warp arrangement indicated the “Lool” technique typical of Azerbaijani weaving, particularly Tabriz, which produced prominent knots visible on the reverse side. The Golabatun sections showed metallic strips wrapped around silk threads, creating a fabric-like effect. Fiber identification showed that warp, wefts, and supplementary weft threads were silk, while the pile was wool. Longitudinal and cross-sectional microscopy confirmed tubular, smooth silk and cylindrical, scaly wool fibers. Chemical tests with 5% NaOH and lead acetate corroborated these findings. Support threads included cotton and wool, with characteristic thermal and morphological behaviors. Golabatun threads were found to consist of silver coated with gold, with minor copper content, which was confirmed via microscopic, SEM-EDS, and chemical analyses. The gold layer is more concentrated at the exterior, serving as both decorative and protective coating. FTIR analysis identified natural dyes: indigo for blue, a combination of madder (Rubia), and approximately 10% cochineal for red, mordanted with white alum. Sizing analysis, using the Molisch and iodine-starch tests, confirmed the presence of starch-based carbohydrate sizing. Damage assessment revealed extensive deterioration due to environmental, chemical, biological, and mechanical factors, including color fading, pile wear, warp/weft breakage, moth damage, and previous restoration issues. PH measurements indicated acidic conditions (mean pH ≈ 5), promoting fiber degradation. SEM-EDS results showed corrosion of Golabatun fibers, with silver sulfide and chloride layers forming due to environmental exposure. Conservation tests demonstrated that aqueous washing did not cause fiber swelling or color transfer, confirming the method’s safety. Preventive measures, including controlled humidity (40–55%), stable temperature (18–21 °C), UV-free LED lighting, and display in ventilated laminated glass cases, were recommended to stabilize and protect the carpet while allowing optimal viewing.
Conclusion
The Salting gilt-woven carpet featured a Persian knot, a lul weaving technique, silk warp and weft, and fine wool pile. It was decorated with golabatoon threads made of gilded silver with a silk core;all dyeswere natural and plant-based. Damage analyses of the carpet and its support indicated acidic conditions, weakness and deterioration of silk fibers, and corrosion of metal decorations caused by environmental factors such as light, humidity, and airborne pollutants. Mechanical damages,including fractures, compression, and tears that resulted from improper storage and past restorationsfurther contributed to structural degradation. Wet-cleaning and colorfastness tests confirmed that a controlled washing method was safe. Based on these findings, a conservation plan was designed following the principles of minimal intervention, reversibility, and material compatibility, including the removal of acidic supports, controlled surface cleaning, reinforcement with compatible backing, and limited repair of previous losses.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • technology
  • pathology
  • salting carpet
  • Iranian Carpet Museum
اسفندیاری، نازنین. (۱۳۸۴). حفاظت و نگهداری آثار پارچه‌ای دورۀ صفویه مرمت یک قطعۀ زری‌بافی متعلق به دورۀ صفویه. پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی ارشد منتشرنشده، دانشکدۀ هنر و معماری، تهران.
ارباب‌زاده بروجنی، الهه. (۱۳۹۰). بررسی فن‌شناسانۀ الیاف فلزی گلابتون و اهمیت آن در کیفیت الیاف در درازمدت در بافته‌های تاریخی. پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی‌ارشد منتشرنشده، دانشگاه هنر اصفهان، دانشکده مرمت.
امینی، سرور. (۱۳۹۰). بررسی حفاظت فرش‌های موزه‌ای در ابعاد کوچک با مطالعۀ موردی نمونۀ فرش لهستانی واقع در موزۀ فرش. پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی ارشد منتشرنشده. دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشکدۀ هنر و معماری.
پوپ، آرتور، و اکرمن، فیلیس. (۱۳۸۷). سیری در هنر ایران (از دوران پیش از تاریخ تا امروز). جلد پنجم و ششم. ویرایش سیروس پرهام. تهران: شرکت انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی.
دریایی، نازیلا. (۱۳۹۰). قالی‌های ایرانی و اسامی غیرایرانی. نشریۀ هنرهای زیبا-هنرهای تجسمی، شمارۀ ۴۵، ۴۵-۵۲.
سالاری، کامبیز. (۱۳۷۸). تأثیر دندانه و عوامل فیزیکی بر تخریب برخی رنگینه‌های طبیعی در منسوجات ابریشمی صفویه. پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی ارشد منتشرنشده. دانشگاه هنر اصفهان. دانشکدۀ مرمت.
سلطانی، منا. (۱۳۸۵). مقایسۀ دیدگاه سنتی و نوین در مرمت فرش. پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی‌ارشد منتشرنشده. دانشگاه هنر اصفهان. دانشکدۀ مرمت.
صدری، نسرین. (۱۳۸۱). رنگرزی الیاف و نخ (پشم، ابریشم، پنبه). تهران: نشر فرهنگ اسلامی.
Denny, W. B. (2020). Color, expectations, and authenticity in oriental carpets: The case of the anhalt carpet in the metropolitan museum of art. The Textile Museum Journal, 47(1), 71-81.
Eiland III, M. L. (2000). Scholarship and a controversial group of Safavid carpets. Iran, 38(1), 97-105.
References
Amini, S. (2011). A conservation study of small-scale museum carpets: A case study on a Polish carpet in the Carpet Museum of Iran. Unpublished master’s thesis, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Faculty of Art and Architecture. [InPersian].
ArbabzadehBoroujeni, E. (2011). A technical study of gilt-metal threads (golabatoon) and their long-term quality in historical textiles. Unpublished master’s thesis, Isfahan University of Art, Faculty of Conservation.[InPersian].
Chakraborty, J. N. (2011). An overview of dye fastness testing. Handbook of textile and industrial dyeing, 207–224. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857093974.1.207](https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857093974.1.207)
Daryaei, N. (2011). Iranian carpets and non-Iranian names. Honar-ha-ye Ziba.[In  Persian].
Denny, W. B. (2020). Color, expectations, and authenticity in oriental carpets: The case of the Anhalt carpet in the Metropolitan Museum of Art. The Textile Museum Journal, 47(1), 71–81.
Dussubieux, L., Naedel, R., Cunningham, H., Alden, H., & Ballard, M. W. (2005). Accuracy, precision, and investigation: Mordant analysis on antique textiles by methods. 14th Triennial Meeting, The Hague.
Eiland III, M. L. (2000). Scholarship and a controversial group of Safavid carpets. Iran, 38(1), 97–105.
Esfandiari, N. (2005). Conservation and preservation of Safavid textile artifacts: Restoration of a Safavid brocade piece. Unpublished master’s thesis, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Tehran.[In Persian].
Ghoreishi, S. M., &Haghighi, R. (2003). Chemical catalytic reaction and biological oxidation for treatment of non-biodegradable textile effluent. Chemical Engineering Journal, 95(1–3), 163–169. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S1385-8947(03)00100-1](https://doi.org/10.1016/S1385-8947%2803%2900100-1)
Goldstein, J. I., Newbury, D. E., Michael, J. R., Ritchie, N. W., Scott, J. H. J., & Joy, D. C. (2017). Scanning electron microscopy and X-ray microanalysis. Springer.
Hallett, J., & Santos, R. (2014). Interwoven knowledge: Understanding and conserving three Islamic carpets. Writing Material Culture History, 257.
Kakuee, O., Fathollahi, V., Oliaiy, P., &Mesbahi, S. (2019). Investigation of mordants for dyeing of yarns in ancient Persian carpets (15th–17th century) by IBA methods. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research SectionB: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, 450, 294–298.
Lee, J., Kim, M.-H., & Lee, K.-B. (2014). Analysis of natural dyes in archeological textiles using TOF-SIMS and other analytical techniques. Surface and Interface Analysis. [https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.5594](https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.5594)
Margariti, C., Lukesova, H., & Gomes, F. B. (2024). Advanced analytical techniques for heritage textiles. Heritage Science, 12(1), 388. [https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-024-01509-6](https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-024-01509-6)
MuseoNazionaledelBargello. (n.d.). MuseonazionaledelBargello. Retrieved September 17, 2025, from [https://bargellomusei.it/en/museum/museo-nazionale-del-bargello/]https://bargellomusei.it/en/museum/museo-nazionale-del-bargello/
Peets, P., Leito, I., Pelt, J., &Vahur, S. (2017). Identification and classification of textile fibres using ATR-FT-IR spectroscopy with chemometric methods. SpectrochimicaActa Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 173, 175–181. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2016.09.007](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2016.09.007
Pope, A., & Ackerman, P. (2008). A survey of Persian art: From prehistoric times to the present (Vols. 5–6; S. Parham, Ed.). Scientific and Cultural Publications Company.
Richardson, E., Martin, G., Wyeth, P., & Zhang, X. (2008). State of the art: Non-invasive interrogation of textiles in museum collections. MicrochimicaActa, 162(3), 303–312. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-007-0885-x](https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-007-0885-x)
Sadri, N. (2002). Dyeing of fibers and yarns (wool, silk, cotton). Farhang-e Eslami Publications.
Salari, K. (1999). Effects of mordants and physical factors on the degradation of natural dyes in Safavid silk textiles. Unpublished master’s thesis, Isfahan University of Art, Faculty of Conservation.
Shenai, V. A. (1990). Technology of textile fibres (Vol. 1). Bombay: Sevak Publications.
Sinha, M. K., & Pandey, R. (2024). Non-metallic technical textiles: Materials and technologies. CRC Press.
Soltani, M. (2006). A comparative study of traditional and modern approaches in carpet restoration. Unpublished master’s thesis, Isfahan University of Art, Faculty of Conservation.
Suh, K. (2011). Conservation of a Safavid Persian carpet fragment: Two different approaches to treatment in 1980 and 2010. American Institute for Conservation, 39th Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 80–85.